The Lady Speaks

Israel attacks Lebanon

Lots of worries on my mind today:

Israel is bombing the sh*t out of Lebanon in retaliation for two of its soldiers being kidnapped by Hezbollah. They’ve been attacking Gaza in retaliation for the kidnapping of another soldier.

The Middle East is about to flare like drought-dry timber in the West when an idiot tosses a cigarette butt out the window rather than stubbing it out in the ashtray.

While everyone else is telling Israel they’re overreating just a little, Nitwit….The Decidererer…President Bush says Israel “has the right to defend itself.” Uh, hello?? If there were actually air and rocket attacks on Israel, I could see this as being a defense. (UPDATE: Seems I read the report at MSNBC wrong. Hezbollah did fire rockets into Israel.) But Israel’s response is still more like someone pulling an Uzi and shooting up the neighborhood just because someone put a dent in their car – and the Army telling the victims that it was done in self-defense.

Not to mention that Bush immediately blows right past the people actually responsible and threatens Iran and Syria. More at The Left Coaster.

Also making me worry: Unemployment rolls increased by 19,000 last week. Oil went over $76/barrel, before lowering slightly, but it wasn’t enough to calm Wall Street. White House staffers (not the ones on the low end of the totem pole, naturally) got a $4200 cost-of-living increase in their salaries. Meanwhile, wages for actual working Americans remain stagnant, prices have increased on everything – most especially gasoline – so we’re working harder but buying less.

As a result, working Americans struggle to provide the basics while the bottom line for the richest and their corporations is increasing exponentially.

From the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), via The Left Coaster:

From 2003 to 2004, the average incomes of the bottom 99 percent of households grew by less than 3 percent, after adjusting for inflation. In contrast, the average incomes of the top one percent of households experienced a jump of almost 17 percent, after adjusting for inflation. (Census data show that real median income fell between 2003 and 2004. Average income is pulled up by gains at the top of the income spectrum; the 3 percent rise among the bottom 99 percent seems to largely reflect gains by households in the top quintile of the income spectrum. In contrast, trends in median income capture the experience of households in the middle of the income spectrum.)



Income gains were even more pronounced among those with the very highest incomes. The incomes of the top one-tenth of one percent of households grew more rapidly than the incomes of the top one percent of households. The share of the national income received by the top one tenth of one percent of households increased by 1.3 percentage points from 2003 to 2004; in other words, more than half of the increased share of income going to the top one percent of households actually went to the top one-tenth of one percent of households.


It should be noted that wage and salary growth has been unusually weak during this recovery, while the growth of corporate profits has been exceptionally strong. This contributes to growing income inequality, since high-income households own a highly disproportionate share of corporate assets and derive significant income from those assets. With weaker-than-normal wage growth and stronger-than-normal growth in corporate profits having continued into the first part of 2006, it is likely that the increase in income inequality that Piketty and Saez have documented through 2004 has continued since that time and that the nation’s already-large disparities in income are growing yet wider.

As you can see from the chart above, the last time we saw income share disparity like this, we were heading into the Great Depression.

At this point, and considering the Imbecile-in-Chief and his band of Merry Minions who are in charge, I don’t know what to fear more: a second Great Depression, or a third World War.


July 13, 2006 - Posted by | Bush, Cheney, Conservatives, Economy, Employment, Gas Prices, Government, Middle East, Plame case, Republicans, War, White House


  1. Fear them both…for if things go “its” way we’ll get both at the same time!

    Comment by thepoetryman | July 13, 2006 | Reply

  2. Good point. Better buckle your seatbelt; this isn’t going to be pretty.

    Comment by PA_Lady | July 13, 2006 | Reply

  3. As long as they don’t use nuclear or bio weapons it will be possible to recover from it.

    I just fear the day that they use nuclear or bio weapons, ’cause that will be the beginning of the end. 😦

    Comment by cnile | July 14, 2006 | Reply

  4. cnile: But Israel doesn’t have C/N/B weapons…right? *snort*

    You’re right though. As bad as conventional weapons are, at least the rest of the world won’t glow and produce mutant humans, animals, and vegetables. (The ones that are left, that is.)

    What scares me is how much Bush and the Talibangelicals* may push this just to see the Revelation prophecy fulfilled.

    *Saw this on another blog – I think Sadly, No! – and just had to steal it.

    Comment by PA_Lady | July 14, 2006 | Reply

  5. Yes we all understand how bad a job the US government is doing, hmmmm maybe we should vote and get the knowledge out to those who don’t understand (a lot of voters in this country don’t know more than what they see on TV) so lets put that aside in this situation.
    How would you feel if the USA was sitting in land that was promised to them long before the rest of the world was around. But canada and mexico hated us and vowed to wipe us off from the map. We are democracy and promote peace, but if those two countries are determined to eliminate us, soley on the premise of our religion and our governing ways, wouldn’t you want your country to be on the defensive and to be on the look out and protect our people? What if they started to capture our soldiers, and started shooting missiles into our land. Iran and Syria are supporting Hezbollah, how do you think they have these weapons? that is the concern, because those countries are feeding the fire, they are behind those two groups attacking Israel and they have weapons and armies to go up against Israel. We need to realize the situation is greater than Israel “overreacting” it is them proctecting themselves from a greater conflict, a war that could end all wars.

    Comment by jgritz | July 20, 2006 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: